it did touch on this affair with paula broadwell, something he said very much regretted. in addition he told the committee members that these talking points that were put together by the cia ultimately, they do not know who was responsible for that final version that was given to ambassador susan rice. and this is significant. this pushes the focus over to the administration and the white house as to whether that intelligence, intelligence assessment was somehow massaged because what we're told from this morning that it did look different than the initial assessment. number three, is the issue of what the general told congress that first week after the attack. september 14th, several lawmakers have told fox that the general seemed very much wedded to the administration's explanation that it was an anti-islam video, though today he said he believed it was terrorism from the first day. >> no. there were many streams of intelligence but he also stated that he thought all along he made it clear that there was significant terrorist involvement. and is not my recollection of wh